Google+ Followers

Thursday, 2 October 2014

Kathy Jackson’s next big vacation

Kathy Jackson’s next big vacation



45



Kathy Jackson next long holiday may not be so nice (Image: supplied)


With Kathy Jackson again failing this week to turn up to the Federal Court action against her by the HSU, Peter Wicks from Wixxyleaks looks at the multi-million fraud claims against her, which dwarf those of any she accused.



It feels kind of weird to be following the lead of the mainstream
when it comes to Kathy Jackson, but given they are on the same page as
me now and have far greater resources, I guess I’ll become accustomed to
it.




However the revelations that surfaced this week regarding her are really nothing new, just some extra details on what HSU members’ money was being spent on by Jackson.



On 1 August, I gave a tally of
the questionable spending I was aware of by Jackson, which I tallied up
to approximately $1.7 million. At the time, I mentioned that some of
the $1 million in credit card expenditure would have been legitimate
spending — we are now starting to see details about some that allegedly
wasn’t.




Evidence presented to the Federal Court shows some expenditure that
union members allegedly footed the bill for was on Jackson family
holidays. These included multiple trips to Hong Kong, New Zealand, Port
Douglas, the Gold Coast, and multiple ski trips to Falls Creek and Mt
Buller.




I wonder if the Fair Work Commission vice president appointed by Tony Abbott, Michael Lawler, took any of these member funded trips with her.



This new evidence formed part of the HSU National Office’s claims
against Kathy Jackson for civil damages before Federal Court this week.




With the new credit card expenditure evidence, the total civil claim
against Jackson is approximately $1.4 million — well in line with the
amount I had calculated in August.




(At the time of publication, IA has sighted the evidence in the Federal Court matter but, for legal reasons, we cannot publish them in full as yet.)



With Kathy Jackson facing this much in civil claims, maybe disgraced former shock-jock and blogger Michael Smith should start looking for a new granny flat to bunk in





Other Jackson expenditure included in the claim includes spending at
HSU members’ expense at retailers such as Myer, David Jones, Safeway,
Vintage Cellars, Harvey Norman Electrical, Betta Electronics, JB Hi-Fi,
L&L Shoes, Seed Clothing Store, Ted’s Cameras, Borders Books and
Music, RG Madden Giftware, Bed Bath & Table, Poppyshop, Babystitch,
Downtown Duty Free and Kleen Design.




Kathy Jackson also stands accused of double-dipping on her annual leave, by claiming a total of 1,318 hours twice. Maybe all that spending was such hard work she thought she needed extra holidays?



Also part of HSU acting national secretary Chris Brown’s affidavit
was a list of cash cheques Jackson had allegedly withdrawn from the HSU
#3 Branch account. In under three years, between 2007 and 2010, these
cash cheques totalled $230,037 — the bulk of them allegedly being drawn
without the BCOM approval Jackson has usually tried to rely upon, in the
past, to deny culpability.




Bear in mind, this total is from a separate account to the NHDA account, to which Jackson has sole access, that contained the $250K she received from
the Peter MacCallum Cancer Hospital so the hospital could avoid paying
workers $3 million in unpaid entitlements. This means the $230k in cash
cheques does not include the two cheques Jackson gave to her ex-husband for $50K and $58K.




According to Brown’s affidavit, some of the cash cheques were used to
help pay for holidays and some went into Jackson’s mortgage account.




Five of these cheques, totalling $24,000, were allegedly signed by Kathy Jackson during 2008 while she was not even an employee of the branch, let alone an officer. It may as well have been me signing the cheques for all the authority it allegedly had.







This time in Federal Court there was no phone-ins from Michael Lawler while
birds sang in the background. Jackson was once again a no-show and
nobody showed up on her behalf in person, via phone, or via Skype.




Jackson claimed to have been sick — something impending doom and bankruptcy may frequently be seen to bring on. Mark Irving,
appearing for the HSU, wasn’t so sure about the sudden illness given
Jackson had allegedly failed to comply with court orders to appear 17
times before.




So, what’s next?



Well Jackson has until 10 October 10 to make a submission to the
court and then, on 14 October, she is due to face the Federal Court.
Maybe this time she may even grace them with her presence? Stranger
things have happened.




The HSU has made application for a summary judgement on the matter,
which may leave Jackson facing around $740k in civil claims, payable to
the HSU.




If a summary judgement is granted by the court, it is then expected
the matter will then be referred to Victoria Police for criminal
investigation.




If the summary judgement is granted, it is also expected that the
$660k in credit card expenditure will be referred to the Fair Work
Commission to retrieve on the Union’s behalf, once again putting Vice
President Michael Lawler in an awkward position.




If the summary judgement is not granted, it will likely be added onto
the civil proceedings before the Federal Court, which will then total
around $1.4 million.




This is substantially more than the combined sums of those Jackson claims to have blown the whistle on.



For those of you who think this new information on credit card expenditure is the evidence Jackson was seeking to keep suppressed
from Chris Brown’s witness statement, think again. This is not what we
are waiting on the Royal Commission to decide as to whether they will
allow it into evidence.




This, of course, means that there are even more allegations yet to emerge relating to Kathy Jackson’s behaviour.



Some people who I have spoken to suspect Kathy Jackson may be
currently working hard to hold onto the money by shifting it around to
avoid giving it back to union members that she allegedly ripped off
without a passing thought — perhaps even by putting it into the name of
her partner, Michael Lawler.






The irony of this suggestion is not lost on me.



Rewind the memory back to a couple of years ago, when Craig Thomson was the most poisonous name in parliament.



There we had Tony Abbott, his heart apparently bleeding for the
long-suffering members of the HSU, telling everybody with a long face
how bad he felt for these poor ripped off workers.




Now that the woman he described as heroic ‒
a Joan of Arc of the union movement, no less ‒ and someone he admired
greatly is being taken to task for allegedly defrauding the same members
of more than 50 times the amount Thomson is appealing his sentence for,
Abbott is noticeably silent about the “poor workers”.




If she tries to hide the members money via the Tony Abbott appointee
Michael Lawler, the damage that could be done to Abbott and his
government should be significant indeed and the Fair Work Commission ‒
which relied almost solely on Kathy Jackson’s tainted evidence to
produce their initial, now totally discredited, report ‒ may as well close their doors for all the credibility they will have left.




Bear in mind also, Thomson is appealing against his verdict.



No matter what happens, it will be interesting to see how events pan
out. After all, it is clear that Jackson may have succeeded in making a
mockery of the Royal Commission by avoiding cross-examination ‒ so far,
at least ‒ on the bulk of allegations against her, but she is running
out of excuses and chances in the Federal Court.




For union members, the 14th of October can’t come soon enough.



And Kathy Jackson may soon need to start packing for her next long vacation at the public’s expense.



You can follow Peter Wicks on Twitter @madwixxy.



Creative Commons Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License







No comments:

Post a Comment